This intro video tells you why I am moving content to Locals.
Personally, I'm above this kind of humor, but thank goodness these robots are not.
I include two versions of the same joke. Which one works better?
I reviewed the Bedford's law definition: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford's_law. And I took a look at the Bedford law calculation applied to the 2020 pres race published here: https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords
The impossible-to-explain Bedford's law violations in WI, MI, IL (but not GA nor FL) are unique (as presented at the URL above) to the presidential race and 100% of them massively favor Biden. That statistical violation, by itself, does not prove fraud.
But my reading of the data and the statistics is they tell law enforcement EXACTLY where to look. And that place is NOT ballots. Bedford's law violation would NOT happen counting fraudulent ballots. It happens when you fat-finger the results up the chain, after each "ward" or "precinct" has been reduced to a single data record. Those fat fingers already have names on them.
That is, if there IS a fraud, then it should not take very long at all to find out.
