I've been watching Bret Weinstein's interview with Dr. Pierre Kory (M.D.) on the alleged suppression of Ivermectin as a therapeutic for COVID-19.
The claim is that a meta-analysis of Ivermectin studies -- none of which are the highest quality study -- show an obvious and huge benefit to using the drug.
Put another way, the "signal" that the drug works is so strong that it is obvious in any kind of study no matter the quality. And when you consider all the studies together (meta-analysis), the effectiveness of the drug is nearly beyond doubt.
So why aren't we using it to help end the pandemic?
Because there are lots of doubters.
Why?
It's the Trump-Hydroxychloroquine problem.
As we all remember, Trump's promotion of Hydroxychloroquine caused the entire media complex to brand him a dangerous moron because the studies showing the drug is effective were low quality. Anyone who agreed with Trump got branded anti-science and dangerous.
Then comes Ivermectin. It's the "same thing" but with a different drug. It's cheap, known to be safe, easy to get, and already in the market. No one wants to be the next idiot promoting something like a Trump drug.
Fake news might have killed millions of people worldwide because demonizing Hydroxychloroquine made it impossible for serious professionals to consider Ivermectin without risking their careers and reputations. It was just too similar.
That's the persuasion filter on this situation. I don't have an opinion on whether Ivermectin works, but the story is fascinating.
Today I will remind you how to gaslight yourself using the Democrat method.
All the news is fake today. As usual. But this time is more spectacular.
I can’t write more than one sentence without falling asleep. The long Covid is kicking my ass. Come try to keep me awake.
Here's one for the conspiracy theorists! Paging @PianoPsych!
CERN is firing up again on July 5 2022. There's literally zero news on the MSM.
Here's the weird part. There's a statue of Kali in the plaza. There was a video of a ritual human sacrifice floating around 8 years ago. It's still on YouTube.
Remember all those Mandela effects? The coin was termed in 2009....the year after the first time CERN was used. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-mandela-effect-4589394
The rumor is every time CERN collides particles it creates alternate realities where details bleed from one to the next. They are set to spin up again in 5 days. Rumor is this is supposed to be one of the bigger collisions planned.
I searched CERN July 5 2022 and the only hits on the first page are references to satanic rituals, demonic entities, and extra dimensions. There's literally nothing the mainstream would consider legit.
Try to remember this current timeline. Let's see who makes it ...
Scott’s utopian city sounds like a one size fits all approach. One insurance company, one city plan etc. sounds like what the communists promise. A house that is owned by someone else doesn’t insure that you will have no problems, it just means that you’ll have to wait longer to have them fixed. Utopian societies are a fantasy .
On the other hand, in the fifties, a bunch of Levittown were built. Small houses, nice neighborhoods. They worked pretty well until the seventies, when the new people who moved in stopped caring for the properties. Gangs moved in and the properties went to hell. I watched it happen.
